🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's childhood". A law is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to approve a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful foundation," stated one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is mostly unfolding at the regional level amid national gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures demanding parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various politicians to copy Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, other states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, international bodies strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

While this global discussion evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments globally are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.